Friday, July 26, 2019

Using Authorship to promote better writers – Part 8


WHAT?
My next lesson on writing was a follow up on the lesson started by my student teacher. She had begun a memoir lesson as this was the next step for the children. She set them up by asking them to observe a routine of a family member after she gave them an exemplar called, “My Dad shaving.” The children’s next step was to go and observe and make mental notes to help craft a piece of writing. Her idea was to use a graphic organiser to help the children to understand the beginning, middle and end of the routine.

The children were required to write in the different shaped boxes the routine they had observed and with Teacher support this was achieved successfully for some children. As part of the follow up, I gave the children I piece that I had written on my routine about getting ready to travel  by aeroplane, as I had just been away to Christchurch for the weekend. I had discussed with Verity where I should take the children’s writing after they had started but hadn’t finished the previous lesson.

I showed Verity my exemplar and my lesson plan before teaching this memoir writing. The pre-observation help me to clarify what she was looking for and where I hoped to take the lesson. I wrote notes on my plan and I was ready to teach the children to notice how good writers can combine different genres to describe to reader what is happening.

I read out my piece for the children and asked them to find the steps I had taken to get ready to go on an aeroplane. The children sat in a circle and worked collaboratively to highlight the steps within the exemplar. The children used Think-Pair-Share to tell each other how the highlighted words were only part of the writing. I challenged them to tell me why this was so. The children were able say that the author (myself) had describe what I had done and the writing tools I had used.

My observation was over and I shared the text type, the purpose and the success criteria for this piece of writing. I asked the children to tell me what they hoped to achieve and what their piece of writing would have in it. I worked through the visualisation techniques that Verity had shown us with very little ‘buy-in’ from the children with a number of them signalling each other through half closed eyes as well as one child calling out. The children were given time to write. I worked on a table with my more reluctant writers and one child who had been away for the previuos week.

On the teacher’s table, one child who is a capable writer but takes ages to get going sat with his piece. He didn’t get going as usual. The noise in the class was beginning to get noisey and the children weren’t writing. I stopped the class, and step by step told them that they had to create a picture in their head in order to be able to write. I showed them that the step that they had written with my student teacher were only parts of the writing and they were writing so the audience could understand. The class became quiet once more and the children were writing. I continued working with the children on the writing table.

Once the children had become noisey again and I looked at the time, I brought the children back to the writing circle so they could share what they had written for the others. The lollipop sticks were used so the children were randomly chosen and shared their best sentence they had written to describe.

SO WHAT?
I was of mixed feelings as I was very surprised on how the children had analysed the exemplar and what they had taken on board about writing tools. I had my observational feedback from Verity the same afternoon which helped as she pointed out that I was taking too long in analysis stage and I needed to deliberately tell the children that my exemplar was a piece that was used to describe and had elements of steps embedded within it. As my children are Year 3s and 4s, it makes more sense to do this.

I also shared my concerns on what was happening during the visualisation stage of the lesson and how I found it very disruptive to getting the children to know what they were writing about. Verity said that I need to be explicit and set very high expectations, challenge the children to understand the purpose. That by running ‘the movie in their heads’ it will make them better writers and it also fires up the synapses in their brain so that they can write with more clarity. I did say that I had to stop the writing time as the children were getting too noisy and she showed me where I had missed the mark in the lesson. When I told her what I had done, she said that can happen sometimes it can be an idea to shelf that lesson and start again. She shared with me times when she knows that lesson hasn’t been as good as it could have been by the effort of one of her children.

NOW WHAT?
My next step is to ensure that I am working on making the lesson do-able in the given time right through all the stages. Maybe not a whole piece but through the whole lesson sequence. It will make the lesson seem faster and the children will be more engaged.

When leading the children through the visualising stage, I need to be firm and fair to ensure a high expectation of behaviour.  If I am successful with this the children will know what they need to write and their writing will have more sincerity.

Good teaching must be slow enough so that it is not confusing, and fast enough so that it is not boring.
― Sidney J. Harris