Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Learning in the 21st Century - 6 problems with our School system

After watching this video, it validates what I have been learning about in Mindlab and how I wish to change my pedagogy to be. How can I empower my students to be more collaborative, think for themselves and manage their time effectively as well as following their passions?

Highlighted in this video are 6 problems:- What I need to do so that these problems aren't so evident in my class..

1. Industrial Age Values - By encouraging creativity, communication of ideas and working collaboration I will be setting up my students up for the 21st Century.
2. Lack of Autonomy and Control - By empowering the children to manage their own time and make decisions in regards to their own learning, I will be enabling the children to have more autonomy. It is important that I ensure that the children are filling in their timetables to how they want to.
3. Inauthentic Learning - I need the learning in my classroom to be more authentic and deeper, I can do this by using NOTICE/THINK/IMITATE/INNOVATE.
4. No Room for Passions and Interests - By using the Learner Pathways and the children's passions I can elevate the learning that is happening in the classroom. Using questions such as "What are you good at?" "What do you want to do?", I will be able to encourage the children to follow their passions, and likes. I need to recognise all of the potential in the class.
5. How we learn - By recognising the needs of the children in how they learn, how much time it takes and by being open to giving those who need more, more, whether it be more tools and resources that cater for the individuals, I will be giving all my students a good chance to learn.
6. Lecturing - I need change my role in the class, to be one of a facilitator of learning, encouraging the children to find and access knowledge through digital technology and collaboration. I can do this by setting up Google classroom where the children can access the information in a range of ways and for their own needs.

If I want to prepare my students for the modern world, learning to effective and engaging I need to fundamentally change the way I do things in my classroom.



Friday, April 13, 2018

Week 19 – Communities of Practice


Descriptive
Inquiry 1 – Flipped Learning
How do I implement digital tools and collaborative practices to promote and emphasise a flipped learning environment for my Year 4 class.

Communities of Practice:
Within my Year 4 class, that has a range of digital savvy children, their families encouraging the use of Google classroom to achieve a flipped environment where the learning is happening inside and outside the physical classroom. Also within my school, there are a few teachers, one of whom is a certified Google facilitator, who can help me to flip the learning in my class.

Inquiry 2:- Seesaw
How can I use digital tools and collaborative practices to improve the learning network for the teachers within my team and encourage them to build relationships with their families and whanau.

Communities of Practice:
The Year 4 syndicate is made up of 4 teachers, myself  and  another experienced teacher, a 2nd year PR Teacher and a 1st year PR Teacher. There are varying levels of talent and expertise, although there seems to be some level of reluctance. This year, the school has set up an online portfolio system to showcase the learning that is happening inside the classroom. A percentage of the teachers who use Seesaw regularly  now have developed positive relationships with their stakeholders.

Comparative
Views of others in Flipped Learning CoP
Google classroom has been away to establish flipped learning within the class. I have one parent upload photographs for his daughter to write stories on but all in all there has been some reluctance from the children and parents alike to add to the site, they see it as my domain. Although when I have drawn their attention to others comments, they seem willing at the time to add but at a later period. The children do visit the classroom quite regularly to revisit the learning and use it like modelling book.

Learning Theories Related to Flipped Learning CoP
In 2008, Bergmann and Aaron Sams began to embrace what they call the Flipped-Mastery model. This is mastery learning that used technology to time-shift the individual instruction. They created videos for each learning objective and posted these online so that as students moved through the content; they were able to move at their own pace. Technology freed up the teachers to individualize the learning for each student. (Bergmann, Sams 2012).

Views of others in Seesaw CoP
The views of my team can only be described as ‘the laggards’ (Robinson 2009) when using the school’s new initiative (Seesaw) as their data reflects this. They have avoided participation as they believe it has only added to their workload. There are teachers within the school who have acknowledged the benefits of using Seesaw and make valuable contributions to the wider community with little or no extra effort to their usual workload.

Learning Theories Related to Seesaw CoP
The theory of connectivism provides insight into learning skills and tasks needed for learners to flourish in a digital era (Siemens, 2004) which could be useful.  Aspects of Seely-Brown’s situated cognition learning theory could also contribute to this topic as learning while interacting with others through shared activities and language could occur for teachers (Olson, 2015). 

Critical Reflection
By applying the Spirals of Inquiry model to my thinking I can see that there are benefits to persevering with using a flipped classroom approach especially now that I nearly have ono-to-one devices in my class (22 devices for 28 children). I need to encourage the children to work with their parents and whanau at home to showcase the learning more, and to make it more challenging so that they seek help from each other.

With my Team, I need to work with them so that they can reflect on the purpose of using Seesaw to display the learning, not just a ’peek hole’ approach but to knock down whole walls so that parents and whanau can actually ‘see’ what is happening in the class. I can do this by ‘buddying them up with the early adopters to see how they are using the online portfolio and work with the leadership team to come up with ways that teachers can give specific feedback that will encourage and accelerate learning for our students.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Maximizing face time. Training & Development ,68(2), 28-31.

Nichols, D. (2012, September 18). Flip Classroom Instruction: How to Guide Part 1 -- Educational Technology Tips.

Olson, M. H. (2015). An introduction to theories of learning. Psychology Press.

Robinson, L. (2009). A summary of Diffusion of Innovations. Changeology. Retrieved from http://www.enablingchange.com.au

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. eLearnSpace. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Sunday, April 8, 2018

Week 18 Reflecting on changes in my future oriented teaching practice using Gibb's reflective cycle


Description – Last year, our reporting system to parents changed to respond more with a personalised learning focus. The PEP (Personalised Education Plan) template encourages teachers to focus on the likes, strengths and visions or dreams of the child, including a focus on what the parents want the learning journey to look like. The parents, teachers and the child meet to discuss celebrations of learning and where to next. When students have ownership of this process and parents collaborate with them Hattie (2012) assures us the effect size on their learning will be greatly increased.

Feelings
In the beginning, I thought that this was going to increase my workload again and was ready to be on the ‘fight or flight’ mode. Due to the collaborative discussions and understanding the why as well as being one who likes to gets things done, I choose to get on board. I was pleased that we as a school were acknowledging the personal pathways that were needed in order for all learners to succeed. My questions initially were: - How will this change the learning for the learners? What changes would I need to make to my planning? Will I need to find more resources on everything? How well do I really know my learners?

Evaluation
After being an early minority, I can now see how this reporting is beneficial to all stakeholders, as it is creating a purpose for the learner, parents and teachers to personalise the learning.  I’m sure that when our school leaders sort to change our reporting method, they were aware of the need to be mindful of the chaos that would exist and overcome any barriers to cope (Fullan &Miles, 1992). Just this term we have reported again to parents with some modifications to the initial template showing progress in reading, writing and mathematics. Most of the focus has been on the strengths of the child in the key competencies, and how as a collective we can shape the learner for each individual. This time, the response has been overwhelmingly positive for all stakeholders.

Analysis
With these personalised learning plans, my planning is now more responsive to the needs of all learners and they know what their individual goals are, these are skills based as opposed to knowledge based. As quoted by Cavanagh (2014) “Each student should have a "learner profile," or a record documenting his or her academic strengths and weaknesses, motivations, and goals; students should have personal learning paths that encourage them to set and manage their individual academic goals; students should follow a "competency-based progression" through topics; and their learning environments in most cases, schools should be flexible and structured in a way to support their goals.”, we are well on the way towards this.

Conclusion
As I get better at aligning the needs of my children and taking on a more facilitator role I can see the purpose for getting the learner pathways right for each individual and sharing the learning journey with family and whanau. This is an area that I need to continue to work on to establish more ways of transferring the ownership of learning from teachers to students.

Action Plan
My mission is to maximise the conversations with students to direct them to use and celebrate their success with their learning goals. Use the digital platform of Seesaw to ‘steer’ the children with feed forward and feedback to work towards their goals in the individual learner pathways especially those 21st Century skills sets. For myself, be willing to let go of the old ways…
Here’s to the next part of this learning journey!

Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching — a New Zealand perspective. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education.

Cavanagh, S. (2014). What is ‘personalized learning’? Educators seek clarity. Education Week34(9), S2-S4.

Fullan, M. G., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 745-752.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning For Teachers: Maximising Impact On Learning. Oxford: Routledge.